Google
Hello Guest

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Mustang Sally Farm

Pages: [1]
1
BREEDING / Pasture Hogs
« on: October 06, 2014, 09:21:55 AM »
We have come across information about a pair of sows who have lived on a diet of napier only for years now in the rural countryside with no health or breeding problems.These sows eat only a diet of napier and their piglets also eat only napier.Should this prove to be true then this could really help rural farmers raising hogs with very low inputs.The 2 sows are a cross/hybrid of native and one of the white breeds so not really big hogs but size would not matter if this proves to be true,napier only for feeds with no health and breeding problems.Might be a little on the lean side but I feel that one could add corn in their last month of fattening to help add some fat to them.

Keeping a close eye on this information.Wonder if anyone else has discovered this?

2
BREEDING / Selecting Boars for Breeding
« on: August 04, 2014, 02:11:28 AM »

Testes Size as Predictor for Semen Production and Relation to Female Reproductive Traits
Tuesday, July 29, 2014


Hypor


Hypor tested testes size and results showed that boars with bigger testes produce semen with a higher concentration of spermatozoa than boars with smaller testes and, therefore producing more doses, although the volume produced is reduced, according to Florence Ytournel, European Geneticist with Hypor. In addition, she found, positive correlation to female reproductive traits, such as total piglets born and percentage of piglets born alive, have been found in boars with larger testes.

Hypor

Florence Ytournel

Abstract

Semen production is an important parameter to AI studs in the pig industry. This parameter can only be evaluated once the boar has entered quarantine and semen has been collected. Therefore, a protocol to visually score the testes size of the boars was developed.

Hypor has evaluated these subjective scores of testes size as a predictor of semen production and how it relates to female reproduction traits.

Results show that boars with bigger testes produce semen with a higher concentration of spermatozoa than boars with smaller testes and thus more doses although the volume produced is reduced. Moreover, positive correlations to female reproductive capacity were found.

Introduction

Semen production is a crucial part in the pig industry. However, the related traits (volume collected, concentration and quality of the semen or number of doses produced by jump) can only be collected after the decision of using the boar and having entered him at least in quarantine. Poor production and/or quality of semen can lead to slaughter of the boars and undesired costs. It would thus be interesting to have an early predictor of the semen production capability of the boar before it enters quarantine.

Testes size has been shown to be a good predictor of semen production (Rathje et al (1995); Huang and Johnson (1996)). This trait has a moderate to high heritability (0.12 to 0.80, Bidanel (2011)), indicating the possibility of efficient selection. According to literature, testes size (width, length or weight) is negatively related with the volume produced but positively related with the concentration produced.

Weighing the testes or measuring them with a ruler is not practically feasible. Therefore we decided to score testes size on a scale from 1 (very small testes) to 5 (very big testes). To achieve the best results possible, the technician has to score the testes independent of the body size of the boar, as bigger hams will provide the impression of smaller testes. The first question that had to be answered was to know if a sufficient variability could be found in the scores to allow further developments towards selection. Selection only works when there is variation. The distribution of the 2,510 first scores (Figure 1) shows a spread of the scores; this opened the door for further research.

Hypor

Figure 1. Distribution of the testes scores

Data provided by our European AI stud were used to confirm that the relations found in the literature also apply here. Data from 21 boars were included. From these boars, 13 boars had a score of 3 and 8 boars had a score of 4. A statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate the relation between the testes size and five production traits:
1.volume (ml) (VOL)
2.concentration (106 spermatozoa/ml) (CC)
3.number of doses produced (N_DOS)
4.percentage alive (P_AL) and
5.motility (scored from 1 to 5) (MOT)

As we are interested in a predictor for early production of semen, only the production results of the first eight jumps of these boars were included.

The effect of the interval between two jumps was tested for all traits but proved to be not significant. On the other hand, the age at first jump showed a significant favorable effect on the volume produced – +0.8 (or 0.027 oz) ml per day of age – but a significant unfavorable effect on the concentration of the semen produced – -0.3 (or 0.01 oz) million spermatozoa per ml per day of age (Table 1).

Hypor

This analysis confirmed that boars with smaller testicles produce a higher volume of semen with a lower concentration than boars with bigger testes. The increased volume does not compensate for the concentration and thus boars with smaller testes will produce fewer doses. No statistical difference could be found between the two groups in the quality traits of the semen.

Further investigation on the variability of the production traits indicated that the variance in the number of doses produced will stay similar, however with a higher average number of doses produced (Figure 2). Selecting on testes size would be profitable from a production point of view, without being at the expense of increasing the risk of having some less productive boars.

Hypor

Figure 2. Number of doses produced depending on the score of testes size.
The green points represent the average, the extreme horizontal lines delimit the region containing 95% of the records.

A final point to be evaluated was to check that bigger testes are genetically linked to favourable reproduction results in the females, i.e. do the female relatives of the boars with the bigger testes also produce larger litters?

To assess the genetic link between the scores on testes size, we included the scores of the 2,510 boars evaluated and the farrowing results (total number of piglets born, percentage of piglets born alive and percentage of piglets weaned) of 4,866 farrowings from 1,244 sows.

The estimated heritability of testes size was 0.20. This estimate is in the range found in literature (Bidanel (2011).

Hypor

Genetic correlations between testes size and the female reproductive traits were estimated to be positive and significantly different from 0 for total number of piglets born and the percentage of piglets born alive. The correlation with the number of piglets weaned was slightly negative but statistically not different from 0.

There are very few articles on the genetic relation between the testes size and the reproductive results of the females. Nevertheless, the positive correlation between NBP and testes size is in accordance with the results of Smital et al. (2005).

Conclusion

Size matters! Size of testes in boars is related to the semen production.

The visual evaluation of testicle size appears to be a good predictor to select boars with a higher semen production capacity.

Positive genetic correlations were found with total number of piglets born and the percentage of piglets born alive, providing a first insight into a possibility of indirect early selection for female traits on the boar side.

Co-authors of this paper are E. Brunet (France Genes), P. Derks (Hypor) and A. Huisman (Hypor).

July 2014

3
Small ruminant (sheep and goat) / G6S in Nubian Breed and Crosses
« on: April 22, 2013, 06:05:45 AM »
A Genetic
Defect and its Management
 by Dagny Vidinsh
 
All
animals, including dairy goats, have numerous genetic defects of varying
severity. We are all familiar with the occasional multiple teats, for instance,
and with such defects as undershot and overshot jaws. Other defects are rapidly
fatal, and it often is unclear whether the death of a kid should be attributed
to genetics or to misfortune. The exact inheritance of many of these defects is
often obscure; for instance, although most people believe that multiple teats
show up when both parents carry a gene for this trait there is evidence that in
some cases they are actually caused by environmental factors. In order to manage
these undesirable genes breeders usually have to fall back on the "don't repeat
that breeding" strategy, which is very crude and unsatisfactory.
 
This
article will describe a recently discovered genetic defect which is easily
managed and eliminated because it's mode of transmission is straightforward and,
more important, because a foolproof DNA test is available to identify carriers
of the gene. This defect's full names are mucopolysaccharidosis IIID, or
G-6-Sulfase deficiency, and it is usually referred to as G-6-S. It was first
identified in 1987 at Michigan State University, and subsequently the
researchers tested nearly a thousand goats in Michigan and concluded that about
25% of Nubians carry this gene. All cases are the result of a single mutation,
and appear to be confined to Nubians and their crosses; other breeds were tested
initially and they do not have this particular defect. The affected goats lack
an enzyme (G-6-S) and this results in a variety of symptoms of varying severity.
The main symptom exhibited by affected goats is failure to grow. Sometimes the
kid is smaller than normal at birth, and grows slowly. Some breeders have
reported kids which grew normally for the first three months and then stopped
growing. Other affected goats grow to what appears to be normal size but is in
fact small for the particular bloodlines. They lack muscle mass, appear
"slab-sided", sometimes with blocky heads. Immune function appears to be
compromised, and sometimes they become deaf or blind. The longest-lived goat
known to be G-6-S affected died at just under four years of age, and death is
usually due to heart failure. Unfortunately affected animals can and do grow up
to breed, although they often experience reproductive problems. The same
symptoms can have many other causes, so that affected animals are seldom
recognized as having a genetic defect. Often they grow normally for the first
few months and may be sold before any problems become apparent. In that case the
breeder may blame the new owner for the goat's failure to thrive and early
demise.

Every animal has two genes for every trait, one inherited from
the dam and one from the sire. In turn, that animal will pass only one of those
genes to each offspring, and which one it will be is a matter of chance, like
the flip of a coin. On the average, half the offspring will inherit one gene and
half the other. If the two genes are different, then there is a question as to
which of them will determine how the animal actually looks or functions. The
defective G-6-S mutation is a simple recessive gene, which means that a goat
which has only one copy of it will appear perfectly normal and will not show any
of the symptoms described above. Such a goat is referred to as a "carrier". A
goat which inherits the defective gene from both parents shows symptoms and is
referred to as "affected". A "normal" goat, in this context, is one who has two
copies of the normal gene. If a normal goat is bred to a carrier, then all
offspring will inherit a normal gene from the normal parent. The carrier parent
will pass a normal gene to half the offspring, and a defective gene to the other
half. Thus such a mating will, on the average, produce half normal kids and half
carriers, and no affected ones. If two carriers are bred to each other, then one
quarter of the kids will be normal, one half will be carriers, and one quarter
will be affected. If an affected goat is bred to a normal goat, all offspring
will be carriers. An affected goat bred to a carrier will produce half carriers
and half affected.
 As stated above, research shows that 25%
of Nubians carry the defective G-6-S gene. Almost all of these are carriers,
since most of the affected animals which are born would be culled, and the rest
die early. Most people find it surprising that something which is in one quarter
of the population can have escaped notice for so long. However, random matings
in such a population would result in only one out of sixteen being carrier to
carrier, and only one quarter of the kids from these breedings would be
affected. Thus only one kid in sixty-four (1.6%) would be affected. Given the
variable and obscure symptoms of G-6-S affected kids, it really is
understandable that most Nubian breeders believe that they have never
encountered affected kids. However, many Nubians are line-bred, and this
practice will concentrate certain genes in some lines while eliminating them
from others. It has been observed that the G-6-S mutation is very prevalent in
the same lines which are known for high milk production. Thus breeders who have
been selecting for milk may have inadvertently also been selecting for the G-6-S
defect. Fortunately it appears that the two traits are actually independent,
that you can cull the G-6-S carriers without at the same time culling the high
producers. Usually it is difficult to eliminate a genetic defect without loosing
all the good genetics for which a line is known. For instance, if a buck throws
double teats, then there is no way of knowing which of his offspring will do the
same and which will not. You can cull him, but that seems rather heavy-handed
since the bad gene will undoubtedly live on in some of his relatives.

With G-6-S we are very fortunate to have a foolproof DNA test available
which will tell us whether a goat is normal, or a carrier, or affected. This
test makes it possible to save the good genetics and eliminate the defective
gene if that is our wish. If a superior animal is a carrier, then we can test
the kids and manage them in such a way as to avoid the birth of any affected
individuals.

What is a good management strategy? What is the most
efficient way to save the good and get rid of the bad? The usual recommendation
for such testable defects is to cull carrier males, but not the females.
Remember that if a normal buck breeds a carrier doe, then only half the kids
will be carriers, and none will be affected. Thus if there are some carrier
females in the herd, then using only normal bucks will reduce the incidence of
carriers in the next generation by one half. The average herd would start with
25% carrier females, and if only normal bucks were used the next generation of
females would be down to 12.5% carriers, and the next generation to 6.25%, etc.
This is in sharp contrast to what a carrier buck would do in the same herd: if
used to breed all the does, his daughters would be 50% carriers and 6.25%
affected. Clearly there is much to be gained by testing buck kids and retaining
only normal ones for breeding. While it is relatively easy to cull a buck kid,
one might hesitate to do the same with a proven sire. In particular, there are
some very popular bucks whose semen commands a high price and who are carriers
for the defective G-6-S gene. A reasonable strategy here would be to use these
bucks only on normal does, thus avoiding affected kids. Then one would test the
kids and cull carrier bucks. Although the DNA tests are expensive, if testing
one's bucks prevents the birth of even one affected kid then it is cost
effective.

Unlike tests for diseases, a genetic test does not need to
ever be repeated. Also, the DNA tests are completely accurate, there are none of
the gray areas which can be so frustrating. There is no need to test the kids if
both parents are known to be normal. One can work back from one's foundation
animals and if there really is no problem in the herd then it may be possible to
establish that at reasonable cost. Normally whole blood is used for the test,
but semen can also be used. If an AI buck is a carrier, that can be established
by finding a carrier offspring out of a normal doe, but no number of normal
offspring will prove that a buck is normal.

A number of breeders have
expressed the opinion that the G-6-S defect is no more of a problem than many
other genetic defects, and therefore does not merit any particular attention.
They evidently miss the point that it is the availability of a DNA test which
makes this defect special. One can use goats from bloodlines which are known to
have a high concentration of the G-6-S defect completely safely by just testing
the particular individuals and either rejecting carriers or using them with
proper precautions. There is nothing to be gained by trying to sweep G-6-S under
a rug, and much to be gained by sharing information about it.

One may
wonder why a DNA test has been developed for such an obscure defect, and no help
is available for, say, multiple teats. The answer is simple- humans don't have a
problem with multiple teats, they do with G-6-S. The same genetic defect, when
found in humans, is called Sanfilippo IIID; the affected child appears normal at
birth but soon stops growing, looses muscle mass, has neurological deterioration
and dies. When the same genetic defect was discovered in goats researchers used
them as models for treatment, and goat breeders in turn benefited from their
discoveries.
 
Copyright Dagny Vidinsh, 2001

Many in the Philippines have little background knowledge on this topic.Known from the American side that some carriers of G6S came into country under USPL 480 goat export/im port program and some of those who have imported as private.Should become interesting in a few years time if anything starts to show up or covered up and which Nubian bloodlines are more problematic and avoid from those breeding known bloodlines.The same can be said with the Australian Anglo Nubians,some probably came in as carriers and when 2 carriers are bred,problems will show up and questions will be asked.The Philippines might have to set up DNA testing to prove the Normals from the Carriers and if any are Affected.

4
Small ruminant (sheep and goat) / Rocky Run Sannens
« on: April 18, 2013, 08:57:46 AM »
Rocky Run Saanens are known as one of the top herds in the USA today.Many fine champion dairy Saanen goats produced from this herd.Mustang Sally is pleased to have an opportunity to house some of these genetics into our RP Genemaxer breeding program.

Mustang Sally believes Rocky Run bloodlines will/can make major improvements to any Sannen herd in the Philippines today.This bloodline is from heavy milking lines.

Mrs Pat Hendrickson owner of Rocky Run Saanens
rockyrun-farm.com/coat.htm



ROCKY-RUN ROGUE'S GREYSTONE - S001478968 (PB Buck)   a half brother to Greystone was exported to the Philippines under the USPL 480 goat program.



DOB: 4/5/2009









SSSS : PERFECTION SNOLAN

 





SSS : LAKE COUNTRY SNO COMPOSITION

 





SSSD : SOUTH 40 SCC CANDID CAMERA

 





SS : LAKE-COUNTRY COMPOSIT SCENERIO

 





SSDS : ELEMENTS S.T. KING SOLOMON

 





SSD : ELEMENTS S SOPHIE'S SUZANNAH

 





SSDD : ELEMENTS S.A. SOPHIE

 





S : ROCKY-RUN LC'S ROGUE

 





SDSS : TWO-CEDERS CLEO

 





SDS : GOLD-BANNER TCC JEN'S JESSIE

 





SDSD : GOLD-BANNER LONESOME DOVE

 





SD : ROCKY-RUN JESSIE'S SCAMP

 





SDDS : ROCKY-RUN TC'S SWEET INTERLUDE

 





SDD : ROCKY-RUN LUDE'S SCRUPLES

 





SDDD : ROCKY-RUN RT SHAMELESS

 





ROCKY-RUN ROGUE'S GREYSTONE

 





DSSS : CLOVERTOP'S PLOT

 





DSS : CLOVERTOP'S P. ANDREW

 





DSSD : CLOVERTOP'S LAZAR ANGELINA

 





DS : WILLOW-BROOK ANDREW'S DYNAMIC

 





DSDS : SINGING-SPRUCE MOGUL MEDALLION

 





DSD : SINGING-SPRUCE MEDALLION DYLAN

 





DSDD : SINGING-SPRUCE MAN-DOLIN

 





D : ROCKY-RUN MIC'S SHADOW

 





DDSS : LAKE-COUNTRY COMPOSIT SCENERIO

 





DDS : ROCKY-RUN LC'S ROGUE

 





DDSD : ROCKY-RUN JESSIE'S SCAMP

 





DD : ROCKY-RUN R SCARCE COMODITY

 





DDDS : GOLD-BANNER TCC JEN'S JESSIE

 





DDD : ROCKY-RUN JESSIE'S SCOUNDREL

 





DDDD : ROCKY-RUN LUDE'S SCRUPLES

 

Legend:   Polled   Black   Polled and Black

5
SWINE / Hog Production Management
« on: April 07, 2013, 12:14:35 AM »
Production Management Featured Articles


Evaluating the Contract Finishing Opportunity - Part 1. Is Contract Swine Production Good for You?
Wednesday, April 03, 2013





Contract swine production can be an attractive opportunity to the right individual, family or operation if it fits with the person, the farm and financial situation. Chrisian Boessen of the University of Missouri explains the pros and cons of contract growing for producers.

Increasing numbers of farmers, aspiring farmers and rural landowners are considering a contract hog finishing enterprise as a way to enter agriculture or expand or diversify their current operation.
 
This publication is in response to questions and issues related to this decision and is intended to help with the decision process. Every person, opportunity and situation is different in one way or the other, and the following discussion is more about helping you ask the right questions than giving generalized answers. Even for farmers with substantial operations the decision to enter contract production is one of the biggest decisions they will ever make. It involves a set of decisions related to farm business strategy, investment analysis and personal/family issues. Like any business venture, it is best to go in with 'both eyes open' in order to be satisfied in the long run. The best possible situation for contracting firms and growers is that expectations and reality are in line over the life of the contract and beyond.

What is Contract Finishing?

Contract finishing is an enterprise where two or more parties share the risks, rewards and responsibilities of producing market hogs. For this discussion, the author refers to the two parties as the 'grower' and the 'contractor'. The grower typically makes the investment in buildings and a site, maintains the facilities and provides labor and management associated with caring for the animals, manure hauling and certain record-keeping functions. The contractor typically provides all the inventory items such as animals, feed ingredients as well as technical support, vet services and transportation of pigs to and from producer buildings. The contractor usually specifies a recording keeping system and may provide that as a part of the overall arrangement.

A primary reason that contract production works is that it allows the contractor and grower(s) as a team to spread risk while achieving a higher level of per hog profit because of scale and specialisation. By working together a contractor and grower(s) can create a 'bigger pie' than either might be able (capital and labour) or willing (risk) to create on their own. It is an shared risk enterprise between the grower and contractor where both bring resources to the table, each is shouldering some of the risk, and each is sharing in the overall returns.

Nationwide, approximately 47 per cent of all hogs produced are finished under production contracts. In 2003, the University of Missouri surveyed contract growers nationwide and found that a large majority of growers and contractors were fairly well satisfied with the arrangement and 80 per cent of growers planned to continue with their current contractor.

Why Choose Contract Production?

A major reason why many consider contract finishing is that it tends to fit well into the resource base of the typical farmer/land owner and often offers an income opportunity with more quantifiable risks. The financial returns of most farming enterprises come with significant production, price and financial risks. With contract swine production, price risk is typically eliminated and depending on the arrangement, production risk is primarily assumed by the contractor. Increasingly in the Midwest, contract payment is made on a flat annual dollar amount for each pig space in the building, regardless if the contractor utilises the space. However, contracts offering payment based on a per-pig delivered out of the building have been common in the past and are still prevalent in certain areas.

For farmers with crop-land, the second major incentive to consider contract production is the nutrient value of the manure. This benefit can have significant impact on the cost-side of the overall farming operation in the seemingly permanent environment of high fertiliser prices. A 2012 study by the University of Missouri Commercial Agriculture Program estimated that a 4,000 head grow-finish operation on a 1,000 acre corn-soybean rotation would annually generate nutrients valued at almost $60,000 net of spreading costs based on $0.62 per pound (lb) of nitrogen (N), $0.53 per lb phosphate (P2O5 and $0.50 per lb potassium (K2O).

Relative to non-contract swine production, the amount of capital required can be substantially less under contract production. The primary difference is that little or no operating capital is need by the contract grower. Consequently a balance sheet which is not able to support the full amount of borrowing necessary to engage in farrow-to-finish production may very well support contract production. Contract finishing is also generally considered to be lower risk by lenders and thus the debt capital may be easier to obtain.

Many small- to medium-sized farrow-to-finish operators that are at a crossroads with their operations are moving into contract finishing. Many of these farmers are at a stage where they know investment in farrow-to-finish facilities commits them to dealing with the work of farrowing for a longer period than they desire, given their stage in life. Given modern production technology such as automatic sorting, contract finishing is a way to utilize resources while creating work they can envision doing for a longer period of time.

Contract finishing also can provide a means for new producers, especially young people, to enter swine production and establish their first farm business. Many of the young farmers who got their start contracting in the 1990s have their first buildings paid for and are expanding their farms with additional free cash-flow.

Often there is excess labour on the farm and contract finishing may provide an opportunity to utilise labour and generate income for that labour when few other alternatives exist in the local community. The additional cash flow from the contract operation can help smooth the up and down income from cropping productions or other activities.

The Market for Growers

Contract growers and prospective growers should think in terms of a 'market for growers'. Like any market situation, there is supply and demand. In any given area, there is a demand for growers and a supply of growers. How strong demand is depends several factors such as the presence of contractor operations including sow farms and/or slaughter facilities. Everything else equal, factors that will enhance the demand for growers include access to relatively cheap corn and soybean meal, the presence of feed milling infrastructure, good roads, and not too many people.
 
The demand for growers will also tend to be stronger in areas that have established numbers of contract growers. This sounds obvious but the point is that unless a contractor is up against some other constraint, the contractor will be willing to pay more to establish a grower relationship that is near the other growers as acquiring another grower relationship nearby may lower the average cost of doing business with all the other growers.

The supply of growers in any given area will be largely fixed in the near term and determined by factors such as the number of landowners and farmers in the area, demographics including age and wealth of farmers/land owners, availability of capital, environmental regulations and opportunities for other employment in the area. The supply of contract growers seems to be greater in areas where there is a history of contract production.

For the individual considering a contract finishing enterprise, the take-away of this analogy is that almost everything is easier and the returns may be higher and more stable if you are operating in an area of strong demand for contract growers. In general, it will be easier to start a contract enterprise, have a successful contractual relationship and should you choose to, sell your operation in an area of strong demand for contract production. For example, in an area where there are multiple contractors working with growers, lenders are more comfortable with the long-term prospects for the business, will know more about the business and will be more willing to lend money for contract startups. Operating costs can be lower in areas where there is substantial contract production. For example, in areas of significant production there are more likely to be custom manure applicators and custom building-cleaning crews, which can eliminate equipment costs and reduce labour requirements. Conversely, as you move away from the areas of strong demand, you may have a harder time getting started, receive less for your pig spaces, incur higher costs and face faster depreciation of asset values.

Is Contract Finishing Right for Your Situation?

For producers that have existing facilities that are moving to contract finishing, the primary questions are most likely related to specific contract terms and contract negotiations. If you are starting from scratch and have read this far, it probably means you recognise the potential advantages, but know there is a great deal of analysis left to do in order to make an informed decision about a contract enterprise.

The first thing that should make it clear that this is a big decision is the size of the investment. Unless you have been involved in confinement livestock production, the investment may seem shockingly large. Expect to spend $200 to $250 per pig space to build facilities in addition to development of the building site (roads, grading, electric, water supply etc.). Most contractors seeking new growers expect the grower to build at least 2,000 to 2,400 spaces. Like many investments in farming, this one is a single-purpose asset.
 
Again, like many other investments on the farm, it is illiquid - which is a fancy way of saying it will be really expensive to change your mind. The contract is a long term commitment. The whole endeavour could not be more unlike the 'old days' of getting in the hog business by stringing woven wire on the hillside, sticking a couple thousand dollars in some A-frame huts etc.
 
Before you can decide if it is the right move for you, there are four key issues that you can sort through relatively quickly before you get bogged down in details of contract and investment analysis: know yourself, know your farm, know your financial condition and know the contractor.

6
BREEDING / Crossing for Pasture Hogs
« on: December 07, 2012, 01:45:23 AM »
I have had this idea for sometime.Crossing native boars onto white sows and selecting those that are the biggest and dark color coated and raising them outside as pasture hogs over cage raising.From a breeding standpoint,males can be smaller but the females must be larger in order to produce larger offsprings.Raising natural hogs other than the pure natives is a goal we would like to try.Not sure how growth will be affected with the native blood in them but through selection one might find the odd one that shows promise.I am sure that this has been tried before and maybe someone in this group might shred some information on such a crossing.

Michael

7
POULTRY / World Poultry News
« on: December 06, 2012, 12:16:46 PM »
Poultry Health Featured Articles


Influence of Chlorine Added to Drinking Water During the Preslaughter Feed Withdrawal on Microbiology and Morphology of the Broiler Gastrointestinal Tract
02 December 2012

 

Chlorine added to drinking water for broilers during the feed withdrawal period reduced the numbers of microorganisms in the crops but did not damage the intestinal mucosa, according to new research from Brazil.

In the journal, Poultry Science, F.R. Barreiro and co-authors at Universidade Estadual Paulista in Jaboticabal, Brazil, report an experiment to test the effects of the addition of chlorine to broiler drinking water during a 12-hour pre-slaughter feed withdrawal period on reduction of the quantities of microorganisms, such as Escherichia coli and enterococci, in broiler crops and caeca.
 
Reduction of these microorganisms would likely also reduce contamination of broiler meat by pathogenic bacteria during processing, the researchers explain. They also investigated whether the chlorine caused intestinal damage that could disseminate the microorganisms to the carcass.
 
A total of 40 Cobb male broilers were used. Samples of crop and caecal content were collected for microbiological analysis, and duodenum and jejunum were used for morphological analysis from 10 birds in each treatment.
 
The most probable number (MPN) of E.coli and enterococci in the collected samples of crop and caeca and the measure of the free residual chlorine in water were determined.
 
The scanning electron microscopy from duodenum and jejunum was used to illustrate the mucosa integrity.
 
The salt of dichloro isocyanuric acid (Hidroall do Brasil Ltda, Aviclor choque) was used in the drinking water of the 12 hours of feed withdrawal with chlorine addition to water treatment. Chlorine was added at the beginning of the pre-slaughter period. The nipple valve was pressed with a sterile spatula to collect a water sample in a sterile bottle at the beginning and after the 12-h pre-slaughter period. Free chlorine measurement was performed immediately after sample collection. The concentration of free residual chlorine in the water was 0.052mg per mL at the start and 0.043mg per mL at the end of the pre-slaughter feed withdrawal period.
 
The chlorine added to water was efficient in reducing the quantities of microorganisms in broiler crops and improved the integrity of the mucosa.




Figure 1. Electron micrograph from duodenum of broilers submitted to the following treatments: without feed withdrawal at the beginning of the pre-slaughter period (A), 12 hours of feed withdrawal without chlorine addition to water (B), 12 hours of feed withdrawal with chlorine addition to water (C), and without feed withdrawal after the pre-slaughter period (D).
 





Figure 2. Electron micrograph from jejunum of broilers submitted to the following treatments: without feed withdrawal at the beginning of the pre-slaughter period (A), 12 hours of feed withdrawal without chlorine addition to water (B), 12 hours of feed withdrawal with chlorine addition to water (C), and without feed withdrawal after the pre-slaughter period (D).
 
The researchers concluded that pre-slaughter feed withdrawal should be coupled with crop disinfection because pre-slaughter feed withdrawal increases the MPN of enterococci and E. coli in broiler crops. As a result, they added, it presents a higher risk for carcass contamination during slaughterhouse processing and, consequently, a higher risk for public health.

Reference

Barreiro F.R., S.M. Baraldi-Artoni, F.R. Pinto, M.M.C. Barbosa, J.C. Barbosa and L.A. Amaral. 2012. Influence of chlorine added to drinking water during the preslaughter feed withdrawal on microbiology and morphology of the broiler gastrointestinal tract. Poultry Science.

8
NV_LS320 Nashville, TN  Monday Feb 13, 2012 USDA/TDA Dept Ag Market News
Tennessee Sheep and Goat Auction

2/10/12 Tennessee Livestock Producers Graded Goat and Sheep Sale.
Receipts: 587 (396 Goats; 191 Sheep) Last Sale 535
Next Sale Feb 24, 2012. (Second and fourth Friday of each month)

Goats sold per hundred weight (cwt) unless otherwise noted, weights,
actual or estimated.

Slaughter Classes: Kids
Selection 1
25-35 lbs 239.00         
36-50 lbs 229.00
51-65 lbs 219.00-240.50
66-80 lbs 203.00-216.00
81-95 lbs 146.00-168.00

Selection 2
25-35 lbs 210.00-219.00
36-50 lbs 226.00-235.50
51-65 lbs 231.00-241.00
66-80 lbs 175.00-200.0
81-90 lbs 140.00-155.00

Selection 3
25-35 lbs 204.00-211.00
36-50 lbs 226.50-231.00
51-65 lbs 210.00-227.00
66-80 lbs 170.00-200.00 
                       
Yearlings Selection 2-3
All wgts 120.00-204.00
                   
Slaughter Bucks/Billies
All Wgts 104.00-112.00

Slaughter Nannies/Does
All wgts 92.00-124.00

Kids Feeders Selection 3
40-55 lbs 192.00-200.00
   
SHEEP
Slaughter Lambs-Includes all breeds, sold per hundred weight (cwt).

Choice and Prime 40-60 lbs  220.00-238.00
Good                        220.00
Choice and Prime 61-80 lbs  196.00-224.00
Good                        199.00-219.00
Choice and Prime 81-100 lbs 175.00
Good                               
Choice and Prime 100-120 lbs 168.00-168.25         
Good                                 
Choice and Prime 120-150 lbs
                                               
Slaughter Ewes Utility and Good:
All wgts 70.00-118.00

Slaughter Rams:
All Wgts 82.00-115.00

Tennessee Dept of Ag-USDA Market News, Nashville, TN
Lewis Langell, OIC (615) 837-5164
        www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/nv_ls320.txt


9
FEED FORMULATION / Algae-sustainable alternative for animal feed:
« on: January 19, 2012, 08:42:43 AM »
Algae may be sustainable alternative for animal feed
Posted In: General Sciences

By Cornell University
Wednesday, January 18, 2012

In-depth R&D news and innovations

The pigs and poultry in Professor Xingen Lei's lab have been consuming feed one wouldn't expect in Ithaca: marine algae.

The Cornell animal science professor is testing the unlikely material as a new protein-rich source of feed to supplement and replace some of the corn and soybean meal mix traditionally given to food-producing animals.

By doing so, he could transform a biofuel byproduct into a valuable commodity, potentially freeing thousands of acres of cropland.

"Current animal feed directly competes against human food sources and, thus, is unsustainable," Lei said. "We must develop alternatives to soybean and corn for animal feeds."

Algae produces 50 times more oil per acre than corn, with a much smaller carbon footprint; uses nutrients more efficiently than land plants, with no runoff; and places no demand on high-quality agricultural land or freshwater supplies.

There are an estimated 1 billion swine, 1 billion cattle, 2 billion sheep and goats and 40 billion poultry worldwide. The average pig consumes about 660 pounds of feed by the time it goes to market, Lei said, so replacing just 10 percent of that feed with algae would save a whopping 33 million tons.

Lei's preliminary research found that dried defatted algae derived from biofuel production can replace up to one-third of soybean meal in diets for pigs and chickens. It is an attractive source because it is high in protein -- 20-70 percent, compared with about 10 percent in corn and 40 percent in soy.

Lei and his researchers are now working to determine which algae are best, and the proper ratios of algae, soybean and corn. They are also discerning whether there are risks or additional health benefits for humans in resultant products, such as meat and eggs.

The samples are shipped to his lab from Hawaii, where algae is being cultivated on a few acres near the Kailua Kona Airport as part of a $15 million pilot project by Cellana and a multi-university consortium led by Cornell professors Chuck Greene, professor of earth and atmospheric sciences, and Jeff Tester, professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering.

Ramping it up to commercial scale will require thousands of acres and hundreds of millions of dollars, said Greene.

Which is where Lei can help. Turning a biofuel byproduct into a value-added product could be the key to commercial viability and may spawn other new industries. The global animal feed market is expected to exceed 1.5 billion tons per year by 2020, 15 percent of which (220 million tons) is protein, Lei said.

Not the seaweed found along coastlines or in sushi, Lei's algae is a dried version of their single-cell cousin. Its simpler structure means it is easier to break down, without the complex cellulose that presents challenges to the production of plant-based biofuels like corn-derived ethanol.

It also has a high lipid, or oil, content -- around 30 percent, compared with 4 percent in corn -- and its own inherent stress response can be harnessed to help in oil production. When starved of nutrients, the algae undergoes physiological changes causing it to exude oil -- a process being studied by Beth Ahner, professor of biological and environmental engineering, and Ruth Richardson, associate professor of civil and environmental engineering.

With further innovations, the process could actually remove substantial amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, Greene said, and its use in the production of jet fuel could help the U.S. military meet its goal of switching to a 50/50 blend of fossil and biofuels by 2020.

Stacey Shackford is a staff writer at the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.


10

Minerals and Trace Elements

Goats have an ability to thrive in the harshest environments. Their high digestive ability enables them to deal with high cellulose/high fibre diets of a very coarse nature. Anatomically goats are similar to other ruminants but with respect to mineral and vitamin requirements until recently, very little research had been carried out. That which has occurred has been performed almost by accident using goats as an inexpensive substitute for the cow. There is very little substantial data and very few definitive text books, which is very odd when one considers that there are over 400 million goats worldwide and more goats than sheep in the EU. In fact in some places e.g. The Sudan there are four goats for every person.

Recent surveys show that there are many areas deficient in certain minerals. However, the goat is an intelligent animal and usually manages on free range to eat herbs, weeds and other deep rooted plant material which has relatively high mineral content. However, real free range is very rare in the some countries and for that matter this is true over a large proportion of the world.

If a goat of say 40-45kg (88-99 lbs) bodyweight gives 4.5kg (1 gallon or 1.2 US gals)of milk per day that is equal to a cow of 500kg (1100 lbs) giving 50kg (11+ gallons or over 13 US gallons!) No such animal exists. A goat is at least 50% more productive and efficient for its bodyweight than a cow.

This means that if a goat is giving its own bodyweight in milk every 10 days or less, it is therefore utilising vast quantities of vitamins and minerals. At its extreme, top goats in the UK have been known to yield consistently 9kg (nearly 20 lbs) of milk per day, which is equivalent to her own bodyweight every 5 days!

A goat also needs more minerals and vitamins for maintenance too: with its relatively large digestive system in relation to its body size, the work of digestion involves the use, and loss, of large quantities of minerals.

Before we take the minerals and trace elements individually, there is no absolute distinction between the two - it is merely a matter of degree. Elements that are used at high levels are referred to as minerals, whereas low levels are called trace elements.

Calcium (Ca) and Phosphorous (P)
They are usually considered and always found together, yet they may be considered to be opposite in effect e.g. excess Ca is 'equivalent' to deficiency in P. They are also both interactive with vitamin D as well as iron and copper. 99% is stored in the skeleton and 1% or less is used vitally in enzymatic processes, cell transport, blood clotting etc.

The skeleton is the store for both Ca and P and somewhat surprisingly, the goat can add and draw from this reserve in times of deficiency. There is normally a positive calcium balance during pregnancy when the skeleton is added to and a negative balance after kidding where up to 30% of the skeleton may be utilised.

A goat requires 1.3g of Ca and 1.0g P for each 1kg of milk produced: it requires 7.lg Ca and 4.9g P daily for maintenance. If we consider both these figures it is obvious that a Ca:P ratio of 1.4:1 is ideal, suiting both the above.

Calcium deficiency manifests itself by rickets, milk fever (especially after kidding). Lack of Vitamin D will also help promote this, since it is required for retention of Ca in the bones. Phosphorous deficiency is more likely, less severe and harder to diagnose. Basically it causes 'poor thrift,' lower milk yields and general lethargy. Ca and P work on the thyroid gland together with Iodine to govern the metabolic rate - i.e. yield appetite, 'rate-of-living'. Very crudely, Ca acts as a brake and P an accelerator. Unlike cows, goats excrete a large proportion of Ca and P and therefore have a relatively large requirement.

Magnesium (Mg)
70% is found in the bones and teeth, the rest in the blood. Again up to a third can be mobilised at times of need. Some of the functions of Ca depend upon Mg too. A daily requirement of 1.2g per day is necessary. The first symptom is the lowering of the milk yield, possibly followed by magnesium tetany and hypomagnesaemia. This is most common when animals are put out on to lush grass in spring when the Mg content in the grass is at its lowest and requirement greatest. It is relatively rare in goats.

Zinc (Zn)
This is found in skin, hair and enzymes. Exact requirements are not known but between 10-60 p.p.m. is considered satisfactory. We do know that 6-7 p.p.m. does cause deficiency with stunted kids that do not thrive. Little Zn is available and must be supplied from the diet since it is not stored in the body as a reservoir. Deficiency symptoms are well documented although the extent and frequency are largely unknown. As an example, in Greece a survey of 150 goats showed 2% as having severe Zn deficiency.

Zinc has a profound effect on males - much more than females - since it is involved in sperm production and the development of the sex organs. Deficiency symptoms include high bacteria in the mouth with excess saliva, stiffness of the joints and a low male sex drive. In vegetable diets Zn combines with phytic acid to form insoluble salts and becomes unavailable. Dry diets are more likely to cause parakeratosis and wetting of the feed hydrolyses the phytate salts and liberates the Zn. - so wetting of the feed for males is recommended.

Zn deficiency is best spotted by the condition of the coat - there is reduced hair growth, a staring coat and also lameness. Zinc is not very toxic, one would need around 1000 p.p.m. to cause problems. However vast overfeeding or grazing in close proximity to smelting works has given rise to reports of excess, which interferes with iron and copper uptake, in turn giving anaemia.

Zn in milk is proportional to feed intake and since goats milk is usually too low in zinc to be ideal for human requirements, supplementing with Zn is a real benefit, especially when the milk is required for feeding to babies.

Manganese (Mn)
Occurs mainly in the liver and is another essential mineral, When fed at 5 p.p.m. in the feed, deficiency symptoms were noted. These included lethargy whereby goats would lay down a lot, walk poorly and deformities in the forelegs were also noticed. A change in the sex ratio in favour of male twins was reported and a lowering of the reproductive efficiency in the males and a lower conception rate in the females with delayed oestrus observed. A daily requirement of 60-90 p.p.m. in the feed is generally suggested as being ideal.

Iodine (I)
Low levels are needed daily - this is vitally important since goats can excrete 94% of their daily uptake via the milk, whereas cows lose only 2%. More Iodine in the diet gives directly more in the milk. It is also temperature dependent with six times more Iodine appearing in the milk at 30ºC than at 5ºC.

Iodine concentrates in the thyroid gland in the throat and is used in the production of thyroxine - thyroxine sets the pace for the goat's metabolism. Only 0.15mg per day is required but this is essential. The percentage of Iodine available is proportional to its concentration in the soil and not what is growing on it, i.e. the same Iodine percentage occurs in grass as in deep rooted weeds.

It is worth noting that Iodine should be fed with care as excess will easily put a goat off its feed. The main deficiency symptom is goitre whereby the thyroid swells in an attempt to work more efficiently with what little Iodine is available. A harsh coat is also common and perhaps the birth of live males, but dead female kids. The female has a larger thyroid gland and a bigger need for thyroxine and therefore a greater need for Iodine.

Copper (Cu)
Goats can get deficiency even at normal supplies if sulphur and cadmium are present - emissions etc. from factories are the main culprits. Again very small quantities are required and these must be consistently fed to aid digestion and utilise the iron by forming ceruloplasmin etc.

Again deficiencies are very noticeable in the coat with 'spectacles' forming around the eyes, especially noticeable with dark haired goats. More serious Cu deficiencies can be seen with the appearance of 'Swayback' where the back actually does sway and the goat has difficulty walking. In the UK the most well-known Swayback area is in Derbyshire and there are also 'Teart' areas where goats suffer Copper deficiency caused by the presence of excess Molybdenum in the soil which prevents the copper being absorbed. Cadmium also has the same 'blocking' effect as Molybdenum and this has occured when goatkeepers have put contaminated waste sludge on to their pastures to act as a fertiliser.

Selenium
This element is very toxic in anything other than really minute quantities, but is nonetheless essential. 0.2mg per day is officially recommended. Recent research has shown a link between Vitamin E and Selenium in which they act as co-partners in cell metabolism. Deficient areas exist e.g. here in the UK, the area around Lewes in Sussex is known to be deficient, as is most of New Zealand. The symptoms include white muscle disease and stillbirths.

Basic feedstuffs are often deficient in Se and many have selenium rich compounds added to compensate. Strangely, weeds and deep-rooted plants have a greater concentration of minerals than grass, yet for Se it is the same for all growth. Therefore the best guarantee for adequate Se is to 'Selenise' the soil via a special Se rich top-dressing.

Iron (Fe)
Most people know that Fe is a component of blood - haemoglobin contains 75% of the total in the body. Additionally, some is found in the enzyme systems and iron is fundamental to all living tissue. Deficiencies can occur, especially in kids due to low body reserves and exacerbated by the low iron content of goats milk during suckling (a big difference here with cows and sheep milk).

For adults a daily intake of 75mg is considered acceptable for lactating goats. Deficiency is relatively rare in farm animals with anaemia being the standard symptom. The diagnosis is not straightforward however since it is usually associated with other mineral imbalance problems. Iron toxicity is very rare because of huge doses needed to cause problems. The Fe in grass and oil meals (100-300mg per kg), in Dicalcium phosphates or limestone (500mg per kg) and cereal grains (30-60mg per kg) should provide enough. Any extra poses no problems and the Fe content of the milk is NOT dependent upon the diet (very different from Iodine).

Cobalt (Co)
There is a lot of data on this particular element and it is directly involved in the formation of Vit B12. Sheep have a greater need of Cobalt than cows and goats have 4 times the need of sheep! Deficiency gives off-flavours in the milk, loss of appetite, weakness, emaciation, anaemia, low productivity etc., and the latter symptoms are often categorised under the generic term 'pine'. 0.5 mg is required daily and it is most important that it is given on a daily basis.

For the relationship between Co and Vitamin B12, see the appropriate Vitamin paragraph below.

Sodium (Na)
1.5g per day is required, which is equivalent to about 3.5g of salt (Sodium Chloride). Large excesses are detrimental to Vit A uptake and excess in the diet is excreted in the goat's urine. There are large differences between goats as to preference to salt and a pure salt lick is the best (and cheapest) option. Salt blocks combined with vitamins are not ideal because the vitamin content will degrade fast in this aggressive environment.

It has been reported by McKenzie that all feral goats in the UK live near the sea because salt is so important to their existence. This is clearly nonsense since wild goats also exist in the centre of Asia 3000 miles from the sea!

Potassium (K)
It is now recognised that for goats relatively large quantities of K are needed. It is normally available in feedstuffs containing a high proportion of roughage and should not usually pose a problem. Deficiencies include emaciation, retarded growth, low feed intake with poor milk yields. It is not a toxic element and it is always a wise precaution to incorporate it in feed supplements.

Vitamins

Vitamin A
Now recognised as very important to all livestock including goats and its primary function is fortifying the outer defences of the skin and mucous membranes against disease. Vit A aids disease resistance and is required for good vision, lactation and reproduction. It is not yellow in colour but the carotenoid pigments found in carrots, maize etc. are bright yellow and contain the precursor to Vitamin A known as Carotene.

Carotene is converted in the intestinal wall and this depends upon the thyroid gland. Since the thyroid is very large in the goat, this animal is a very efficient converter of Vit. A - in fact all carotene is converted: this is why goats milk is pure white whereas the milk from cows (relatively inefficient converters) is still yellow with uncoverted carotene present.

Deficiency symptoms are rare and include night blindness, poor reproductive performance and metritis. Vitamin A is destroyed by sunlight and therefore old hay is very low in this vitamin. In winter make sure that kale and other feedstuffs high in Vit. A are fed.

For the new-born kid the colostrum is very important since they have very small reserves of Vit. A. It is worth noting that the Vitamin A content of goats milk is directly proportional to the amount of beta-carotene occuring in the feed.

Vitamin D
Closely connected with Calcium and Phosphorous, Vit. D is required for the deposition and remobilisation of the above into the skeleton. It is the antirachitic (prevents rickets) vitamin and its main source is from sunlight and is formed on the skin. Absorption is through the skin or by simply licking off.

Deficiency symptoms are uncommon but goats that are kept indoors in winter etc. are most likely to suffer and therefore need supplementary feeding. Deficiency of Vit. D is a major cause of rickets, bow legs and osteomalacia and whilst it cannot make up for any absolute deficiency in Ca and P, Vit. D will compensate to some extent to help overcome any imbalance between the two. As in cows, there is a high output of Ca & P into the milk and Vit. D is needed to maintain mobility of these minerals. It has been suggested in France that extra Vit. D is given in the last weeks of pregnancy to prevent hypocalcaemia (milk fever) and this does seem to be very sensible.

Vitamin E
As discussed Vit E is tied up with Selenium as a co-partner, but there are still some doubts as to its exact function. It is known to be concerned with the cell nucleus, the development of the foetus and the performance of the males. It is an antioxidant, facilitating absorption, storage and protection of Vit. A.

Vit. E is found in oil meals and bran - however, if goats can be persuaded to eat cod liver oil, recent evidence shows that deficiency symptoms are CREATED by forming gut conditions favourable to the destruction of both Vit. E and Selenium.

The method of storage of feedstuffs is very important as the concentration of Vit. E is dependent upon it: basic feedstuffs can easily be made to be very deficient simply by bad storage conditions. Goats transfer Vit. E into the milk more readily than cows and should therefore receive daily adequate supplies of this vitamin to ensure milk quality. Apart from white muscle disease and muscular dystrophy, lack of Vit. E also causes sterility in males.

Note that kids have no reserves of fat soluble vitamins (A,D & E) and sudden death of kids less than 2 weeks old is often due to lack of Vit. E in particular. This is normally overcome by feeding colostrum but the Vit. E content is also affected by the nutrition of the dam during pregnancy.

With kids there is degeneration of muscle including the heart, whereas in older animals it will manifest itself as stiffness of the limbs.

The B Vitamins
Goats along with other ruminants are blessed with bacteria that live in the rumen and synthesise the B vitamins. Therefore it has been suggested that supplementation is not necessary, but there are several reasons for Vit. B inclusion:

1. inhibition of synthesis of certain B Vitamins by substances in feedstuffs occurs, especially those with high starch levels.

2. parasites in the gut totally remove certain B vitamins.

3. some B vitamins cannot be synthesised in sufficient quantities to meet demand - especially with heavy milkers and the shortfall must be provided via the feed.

Vitamin B1 (Thiamin)
Conventional feedstuffs contain fairly constant amounts of B1 and the higher the amount fed the lower the amount synthesised. However diets with high carbohydrate content increase the requirement of B1 which is one reason why straight grain diets should not be fed since they act as Vit. B1 antagonists.

There is a relationship between Vit B1 deficiency and disease resistance and deficiency causes damage to the central nervous system (polioencephalomacia and cerebrocorticalnecrosis - PEM and CCN). This is exhibited by collapse, twitching etc. and the only cure is Vit B1 injection. 50-60mg per day is the recommended daily intake. Vit. B1 is also used as a preventative for acetonaemia. Nicotinamide. Also a member of the B group vitamins. Recent evidence again shows limited synthesis and the majority of the vitamin is derived from the goat's feed intake. Supplementation improves milk production and butterfat levels.

There is good evidence that Nicotinamide present in cereals is 'bound' i.e. not available and therefore must be added by supplementation in the diet.

Pantothenic acid
This is another of the B group vitamins. In high cellulose diets e.g. where hay comprises a large percentage, the biosynthesis of Pantothenic acid is impaired.

It is found in fresh vegetables and, in milk, bound to the proteins. It serves an important function in the formation of enzymes and certain antibodies, and since recent evidence has shown that deficiency can occur, it is always best to incorporate it in the feed via supplementation on a daily basis.

Vitamin B12 (Cyanocobalamin)
Directly associated with Cobalt, Vit. B12 has a Cobalt nucleus in a highly complex molecule. Large excesses of Cobalt in the gut will result in analogues of Vit B12 being formed these are identical to the natural vitamin except for a slight molecular variation. These analogues surprisingly have zero vitamin activity, despite being 99+% identical to the original and will cause Vit B12 deficiency symptoms (outlined under Cobalt).

Obviously, administering even more Cobalt is NOT the answer as this creates further problems and the best solution is to ensure a low daily dose of Cobalt is provided and in the case of B12 deficiency, an injection of this vitamin, whilst the gut flora returns to a normal healthy state.

Much more research is needed in this vital science - very little data is available to goatkeepers with respect to Vitamin C, Vitamin K, Biotin, Folic Acid as well as other trace elements such as Fluorine, Chromium etc. - and what about amino acids, enzymes, fatty acids etc.? Only time and continued research will enable us to understand more fully the requirements of the goat and thus be able to cater adequately for her needs.

11
AGRI-NEWS / The Meat Site:
« on: January 02, 2012, 09:42:14 AM »

Friday, December 30, 2011

Brazil Company to Expand ME Chicken Exports

BRAZIL - BrazArtis Assessoria em Comercio Exterior, an import-export company based in Brazil, has announced a campaign to expand chicken exports to the Middle East.


The endeavour is aligned with the growing Brazilian poultry exportation to the region, a statement from the company said.

The total Brazilian poultry production reached 13 million tons in 2011, almost 6.9 per cent increase from 2010, according to TradeArabia. At the same time, the exportation is expected to total 3.937 million tons, over 30 per cent of the total production, according to Brazilian Poultry Union (UBABEF).

"The Middle East region is a focal exportation and trading hub for Brazil. We are confident in the prospects for the upcoming year and will continue to support our business partners by supplying top quality halal and non-halal chicken products at competitive prices," a spokesperson for BrazArtis Assessoria em Comercio Exterior said.

Brazil's exports span across the whole GCC region including Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Jordan, Bahrain, Kuwait, Lebanon, Syria and Oman.

As part of strong tie between Brazil and the Middle East, select exports are certified by the Central Islamic Brazilian Halal Food (Cibal Halal), the Brazilian Islamic Centre for Halal Food Stuff Association.

Pages: [1]

Privacy Policy